Eye Banking in the 21st Century: How Far Have We Come? Are We Prepared for What’s Ahead?

Authors

Donald J. Doughman, MD, Cindy Christian Rogers, MA

Keywords

corneal endothelium, corneal preservation, corneal transplantation, eye banks, eye donation, healthcare economic

Abstract

PURPOSE: This review of milestones in eye banking describes efforts by the eye banking community to ensure the quality and quantity of corneal tissue over the last century and anticipates key challenges going forward.

METHODS: This account draws on a review of the scientific literature, public documents, and eye banking statistics and is augmented by the recollection of the author, discussions with eye bankers, and an analysis of pressing medical and nonmedical issues that will bear on the future success of eye banking in the United States and internationally.

RESULTS: The author identifies five eras of eye banking, highlighting scientific breakthroughs in surgical techniques, storage, and instrumentation; the professionalization of eye banks through development of medical standards and accreditation programs; and the advent of laws and regulations leading to reimbursement changes and donor legislation. The author next identifies five strengths exhibited by the community to achieve those milestones and delineates crucial questions posed by an ever-expanding array of unprecedented demographic, socioeconomic, geopolitical, biological, regulatory, technological, cultural, and ethical challenges.

CONCLUSIONS: Technological advances and collaborative efforts have brought the eye banking community to the enviable position it enjoys today. Only by building on its historical strengths can eye banking professionals worldwide successfully evolve their role in an increasingly complex future.

References

Zirm E. Successful total keratoplasty. Graefes Arch Klin Exp Ophthalmol. 1906;64:581.

Doughman DJ. Corneal tissue preservation, chapter 34. In: Leibowitz HM, Waring GO. Corneal Disorders: Clinical Diagnosis and Management. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders Co.;1998:871-882.

Filatov VP. Transplantation of the cornea from preserved cadavers’ eyes. Lancet. 1937;229:1395-1397.

Chu W. The past 25 years in eye banking. Cornea. 2000;19(5):754-765.
05.

Moffatt SL, Cartwright VA, Stumpf TH. Centennial review of corneal transplantation. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol. 2005;33(6):642-657.
06.

Payne JW. New directions in eye banking. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1980;78:983-1026.
07.

Wilson SE, Bourne WM. Corneal preservation. Surv Ophthalmol. 1989:33;4.

Grim G. I like it here. Minneapolis Tribune. March 26, 1965: p18.

Stevens MJ. Evolution of required request and routine referral laws. In: Brightbill FS (ed). Corneal Surgery: Theory, Technique, and Tissue. St. Louis, MO: Mosby;1999:668-691.

Troutman RC. The operating microscope in ophthalmic surgery. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc.1965;63.

Stocker FW. The endothelium of the cornea and its clinical implications. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1953;51:669.

Harris JE, Nordquist LT. The hydration of the cornea: Transport of water from the cornea. Am J Ophthalmol 1955;40:100.

McCarey BE, Kaufman HE. Improved corneal storage. Invest Ophthalmol 1974;13(3):165-73.

Doughman DJ, Falk S, Mindrup B, et al. Minnesota corneal storage system: 34 ̊C organ culture, chapter 15. In: Cavanagh HD (ed). The Cornea: Transactions of the World Congress on the Cornea III. New York, NY: Raven Press, Ltd;1988: 91-97.

Doughman D. Corneal tissue preservation. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 1988;29(1):50-56.16. Doughman DJ. Tissue storage, chapter 39. In: Krachmer JH, Mannis MJ, Holland EJ (eds). Cornea. St. Louis, MO: Mosby Yearbook Publishers;1997:509-518. 17. Wiffen SJ, Nelson LR, Ali AF, et al. Morphologic assess- ment of corneal endothelium by specular microscopy in evaluation of donor corneas for transplantation. Cornea. 1995;14(6):554-561.

Moyes AL, Holland EJ, Palmon FE, et al. Tissue utilization at the Minnesota Lions’ Eye Bank. Cornea. 1995;14(6):571-577.

Duffy P, Wolf J, Collins G, et al. Possible person-to-person transmission of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. N Engl J Med. 1974;290(12):692-693.

Mannis MJ, Reinhard WJ. Medical standards for eye banks. In: Brightbill FS (ed). Corneal Surgery, 2nd ed. St. Louis, MO: CV Mosby;1993:531-548.

Mannis MJ. The 26th Scientific Session of the Eye Bank Association of America, meeting report. Cornea. 1988;7(4):304-306.

Prottas J. Study of Unmet Demand and Corneal Distribu- tion in North America: Final Report. Bigel Institute for Health Policy, Heller Graduate School, Brandeis Uni- versity, Waltham, Mass; March 1990.

Bonner T, Doughman DJ, Mindrup, E, et al. Mortician retrieval of donor globes: the Minnesota experience, eye bank news. Cornea 1983;2:251-254.

Farge EJ, Fort RA. Two treatments of eye bank donor corneas. Cornea 1985-1986;44:256-262.

National Research Council Committee on Increasing Rates of Organ Donation. Presumed consent, chapter 7. In: Childress JF, Liverman CT, eds. Organ Donation: Opportunities for Action. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press;2006:205-209.

Zink S, Zeehandelaar R, Wertlieb S. Presumed versus expressed consent in the US and internationally, AMA policy forum. Virtual Mentor. 2005;7(9).

Rithalia A, McDaid C, Suekarran S, et al. A systematic review of presumed consent systems for deceased organ donation. Health Technol Assess. 2009;13(26):1-95.

Caplan A, Siminoff L, Arnold R, et al. Increasing organ and tissue donation: What are the obstacles? What are our options? In: The Surgeon General’s Workshop on In- creasing Organ Donation, Background Papers. U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, Public Health Service, Washington, DC: July 8-10; 1991:199-232.

Eye Bank Association of America. 2011 Eye Banking Statistical Report. March 2012. www.restoresight.org/about-us/ebaa-materials-publications/.

Price MO, Price FW Jr. Endothelial keratoplasty – a review. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol. 2010;38(2):128-140.

Aiken-O’Neill P, Mannis MJ. Summary of corneal transplant activity: Eye Bank Association of America, special article. Cornea. 2002;21(1):1-3.
32.

Tillett CW. Posterior lamellar keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol. 1956;41(3):530-533.

Melles GR, Eggink FA, Lander F, et al. A surgical technique for posterior lamellar keratoplasty. Cornea 1998;17(6):618-626.

Terry MA, Ousley PJ. Endothelium replacement without surface corneal incisions or sutures: topography of the deep lamellar endothelium keratoplasty procedure. Cornea. 2001;20(1):14-18.

Straiko MD, Shamie N, Terry MA. Endothelial keratoplasty: past, present, and future directions. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 2010;50(3):123-135.

Melles GR, Wijdh RH, Nieuwendaal CP. A technique to excise the descemet membrane from a recipient cornea (descemetorhexis). Cornea. 2004;23(3):286-288.

Rice A, Spokes DM, Anand S, et al. Endothelial cell survival and graft profile analysis in descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea. 2011;30(8):865-871.

Gorovoy MS. Descemet-stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea. 2006;25(8):886-889.

Kelliher, C, Engler C, Speck C, et al. A comprehensive analysis of eye bank-prepared posterior lamellar corneal tissue for use in endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea. 2009;28(9):966-970.

Kitzmann AS, Goins KM, Reed C, et al. Eye bank survey of surgeons using precut donor tissue for descemet stripping automated entothelial keratoplasty. Cornea. 2008;27(6):634-639.

Cost-effectiveness of femtosecond laser cataract surgery remains unknown in Europe, a report from the European Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgeons meeting, Vienna, Austria. Ocular Surgery News. September 11, 2011.

Lawless M, Hodge C. Femtosecond laser cataract sur- gery: an experience from Australia. Perspective. Asia- Pacific J Ophthalmol 2012;1(1):5-10. http://journals.lww. com/apjoo/Fulltext/2012/01000/Femtosecond_La- ser_Cataract_Surgery___ An_Experience.3.aspx?WT.mc_id=HPxADx20100319xMP.

Melles GRJ, Ong TS, Ververs B, et al. Descemet mem- brane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK). Cornea. 2006;25(8):987-990.

Anwar M, Teichmann KD. Deep lamellar keratoplasty: surgical techniques for anterior lamellar keratoplasty with and without baring of Descemet membrane. Cornea. 2002;21(4):374-383.

Kubaloglu A, Sari ES, Unal M, et al. Long-term results of deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty for the treatment of keratoconus. Am J Ophthalmol. 2011;151(5):760-767.

Holland EJ, Schwartz GS. Epithelial stem-cell transplantation for severe ocular-surface disease. N Engl J Med. 1999;340(22):1752-1753.

Crossdale CR, Schwartz GS, Malling JV, et al. Keratolimbal allograft: Recommendations for tissue procurement and preparation by eye banks, and standard surgical technique. Cornea 1999;18(1):52-58.

Holland EJ, Schwartz GS. Ocular surface transplantation: an overview of techniques, indications, and post-operative management. Cataract & Refractive Surgery Today. 2005(January):76-79.

Heindl LM, Riss S, Bachman BO, et al. Split cornea transplantation for 2 recipients: a new strategy to re- duce corneal tissue cost and storage. Ophthalmology. 2011;118(2):294-301.

Pereira CR, Guerra FP, Price FW Jr., et al. Descemet membrane automated endothelial keratoplasty (DMAEK): visual outcomes and visual quality. Br J Ophthalmol. 2011;95(7):951-954.

McCauley MB, Price MO, Fairchild KM, et al. Prospective study of visual outcomes and endothelial survival with Descemet membrane automated endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea. 2011;30(3):315-319.

Congdon NG, Friedman DS, Lietman T. Important causes of visual impairment in the world today. JAMA. 2003;290(15):2057-2060.

Gilbert C, Foster A. Blindness in children: control priorities and research opportunities. Br J Ophthalmol. 2001;85(9):1025-1027.

World Health Organization. The World Health Report: Financing for Universal Coverage. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2010. www.who.int/ whr/2010/10_summary_en.pdf.

US Census Bureau. The Older Population 2010: 2010 Census Briefs. Washington, DC: US Census Bureau; November, 2011. www.census.gov/prod/cen2010briefs/ c2010br-09.pdf.

Chu W, Dahl P, O’Neill MJ. Benefits of specular microscopy in evaluating eye donors aged 66 and older. Cornea. 1995;14(6):568-570.

Probst LE, Halfaker BA, Holland EJ. Quality of corneal donor tissue in the greater-than-75-year age group. Cornea. 1997;16(5):507-511.

Cornea Donor Study Investigator Group. The effect of

donor age on corneal transplantation outcome. Ophthalmology. 2008;115(4):620-632.

Sugar A, Montoya MM, Beck R, et al. Impact of the cornea donor study on acceptance of corneas from older donors. Cornea. 2012; January 18. [Epub ahead of print] doi:10.1097/ICO.0b013e31823f7550.

Lee P, Relles DA, Jackson CA. Subspecialty distributions of ophthalmologists in the workforce. Arch Ophthalmol. 1998;116(7):917-920.

Aguilar J. Organ donations lag in South Texas, and culture is a factor. The Texas Tribune. March 5, 2011.

Donate Life America, Richmond, Virginia. www.donatelife.net.

Yew YW, Saw SM, Pan J-H, et al. Knowledge and beliefs on corneal transplantation in Singapore adults. Br J Ophthalmol. 2005;89(7):835-840.

Shaheen FAM, Souqiyyeh MZ. Increasing organ donation rates from Muslim donors: lessons from a successful model. Transplant Proc. 2004;36(70):1878-1880.

Ohnuma R. Head, Eyes, Flesh, Blood: Giving Away the Body in Indian Buddhist Literature. Columbia University Press; December 19, 2006.

Associated Press. The gift of sight: The country that exports its eyes to the world. Daily Mail, London, United Kingdom, January 23, 2012. www.dailymail. co.uk/health/article2090206/How-Sri-Lanka-helping-world-biggest-donor-corneas-transplant.html.

Bae HS, Brown WJ, Kang S. Social influence of a religious hero: The late Cardinal Stephen Kim Sou-hwan’s effect on cornea donation and volunteerism. J Health Commun. 2011;16(1):62-78.

Cooper ML, Taylor GJ (eds). Organ and Tissue Donation: A Reference Guide for Clergy. 3rd ed. Richmond, VA: SEOPF/UNOS; 1998.

Randhawa G. Death and organ donation: meeting the needs of multiethnic and multifaith populations. Br J Anaesth. 2012;108 Suppl 1:i88-91.

World Health Organization. Ethics, access and safety in tissue and organ transplantation: Issues of global concern, a report. World Health Organization, Madrid, Spain; October 6-9, 2003. http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2004/9241591390.pdf.

US Food and Drug Administration. Public Health Update: Recall of Heparin Sodium for Injection. Postmarket Drug Safety Information for Patients and Providers; Feb 2, 2008. www.fda.gov/Drugs/DrugSafety/Postmar-ketDrugSafety InformationforPatientsandProviders/ucm112665.htm.

US General Accountability Office. Food and Drug Ad- ministration: Response to heparin contamination helped protect public health – controls that were needed for working with external entities were recently added. Report to Ranking Member, Committee on Energy and Commerce, House of Representatives; October 2010. www.gao.gov/new.items/d1195.pdf.

Lloyd’s. Globalisation and risks for business: implica- tions of an increasingly interconnected world. 360 Insight Report: London, England: 2010;29-30.

Osterholm MT. Unprepared for a pandemic. Foreign Affairs. 2007;86(2).

Kelley NS, Osterholm MT. Pandemic influenza, electricity, and the coal supply chain: addressing crucial preparedness gaps in the United States. Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy, University of Minnesota; November 2008. http://184.73.192.197/ cidrap/files/93/cidrap_coal_report.pdf.